The MUK has structures and procedures in place to ensure that the rules of good scientific or artistic-scientific practice are observed. The Science, Research and Artistic Research department makes use of both internal university quality assurance instruments as well as instruments involving external quality assurance control systems.
Instruments to ensure good scientific or artistic-scientific practice
Internal university quality assurance instruments in this area are workshops, training courses, scientific colloquia and in-depth courses on topics such as plagiarism vs. good scientific practice.
In addition, the MUK research service continuously contributes to ensuring good scientific and artistic-scientific practice.
A structural multi-eye principle ensures internal quality assurance by anchoring the Centre for Science and Research (ZWF) as well as by establishing research services in the Rectorate. Research agendas are discussed in the regular meetings of the Centre for Science and Research and are also discussed with the involvement of the deans in the meetings of the Rectorate.
Plagiarism constitutes a violation of the criteria of good scientific or artistic-scientific practice. For this reason, the Rectorate of the MUK has drawn up a guideline and an independent investigation procedure on this topic to ensure quality in academic practice, based on the relevant study regulations. The guarantee of compliance with these criteria is ensured in several ways with regard to Bachelor's or Master's theses at the MUK. For these Bachelor's and Master's theses, the respective head of the course Scientific Colloquium is primarily responsible for ensuring compliance with scientific standards and scientific integrity. In addition to the supervision and close cooperation with students and subject supervisors, the plagiarism detection software PlagScan Pro has been used at the MUK since the new study regulations 2017 came into effect. The Centre for Science and Research trains the course leaders of the scientific colloquia in the use of this software. The joint commission of the two StuFoKos has designed a routing slip (which summarizes all necessary steps to obtain the degree) to point out the use of this software to the students. A course on prevention takes place regularly and the library supports students in the introduction to scientific working techniques.
The results of the software checks are verified by the head of the Scientific Colloquium. If the suspicion of plagiarism is confirmed, the consequences under study law are applied. For this purpose, there is a rectorate resolution from 2017 which regulates the plagiarism procedure at the MUK. As a registered user of a beta version, MUK has been contributing to the further development of an analysis tool (Author Metrics) since May 2019, with which translation plagiarism and the work of ghost writers can be more easily detected.
By promoting excellent theses, the MUK also provides positive incentives. Since 2011, the MUK, in cooperation with the Cultural Department of the City of Vienna, has been awarding prizes/scholarships for outstanding academic Bachelor's and Master's theses. The awarding of the four sought-after prizes/scholarships leads to a significant enhancement of the young researchers' research achievements at the MUK.
Students are also increasingly involved in projects and activities of the Centre for Science and Research as well as in the organization of artistic and scientific events through contracts for work or freelance contracts as student assistants. In this way, students are already familiarized with scientific activities such as the editing of publications during their studies, thus broadening their expertise. In addition, working at the ZWF is intended to awaken students' interest in scientific work and to show them a possible career path in this field.
In order to ensure the quality of academic theses at the MUK and to give students the opportunity to learn from students, a writing workshop for students in the form of weekly office hours in the library has been set up from the summer semester 2020 onwards. The main focus of this workshop is to provide advice on the preparation of Bachelor's and, if applicable, Master's theses, whereby support is primarily offered in formal aspects.
Instruments to ensure good scientific or artistic-scientific practice, including external quality assurance control systems
The co-financing of publications and conferences according to the Matching Fund Principle guarantees the excellent quality of internally financed projects by basing their financing on the excellence criteria of external reviewers.
In order to ensure the quality of internal processes externally, the ZWF Advisory Board has also been available for internal review processes since the winter semester 2019/20.
Review by external project partners and experts in research and artistic research at MUK, e.g. in topic-related working groups.
Inter-university cooperation: In addition to its excellent reputation in artistic education, the MUK also has unique selling points in the field of artistic research, such as in the areas of operetta, dance, musicals or, in the future, performance art, which make it interesting for other universities as a cooperation partner. Against this background, the MUK is increasingly focusing on inter-university cooperation both nationally and internationally.
Examples of inter-university cooperation in the area of scientific or artistic-scientific research:
Inter-University Research Association Elfriede Jelinek (University of Vienna and MUK)
Research network Beyond the nation, beyond the subject. Rethinking Austrian Modernism (University of Kent UK, Co-Applicant the MUK)
Review by research funding agencies: The scientific community ensures quality assurance by requiring that publications, conference and travel grants, scholarships and, last but not least, externally funded projects undergo a strict review system based on excellence criteria — usually in the form of peer review procedures.